Tags
1984, frankenstein, george orwell, japanese horror story, Koji Suzuki, literary fiction, mary shelley, meme, science fiction
Welcome to the ‘Literary Blog Hop’, a meme hosted by The Blue Bookcase for book bloggers who focus on reviewing literary fiction. This weeks’ hop comes with the question:
“What is your favourite book, and why would you consider it as ‘literary’.”
When I received news of this meme in my inbox, I thought it was the perfect opportunity to talk about a popular Japanese trilogy that has been on my mind ever since I read it about 5 years ago. The books I’m
talking about are known as ‘The Ring Trilogy’. The three books ‘Ring’ (1991), ‘Spiral’ (1995) and ‘Loop’ (2002) were written by Koji Suzuki and became a literary phenomenon all over the world. While ‘Ring’ is the most popular book in the series, ‘Spiral’ and ‘Loop’ provide an excellent follow-up to the chilling story of the cursed videotape that kills its’ viewers in seven days. Here is a short synopsis of each book without any spoilers.
‘RING’ – BOOK 1
“One night in Tokyo, four healthy teenagers die simultaneously. Autopsy reports list the cause as heart failure, but for journalist Kazuyuki Asakawa whose niece was among the dead, it seems something more sinister is afoot. Asakawa’s suspicions drive him to investigate further, which leads him to a strange videotape found in a mountain lodge the teenagers visited together over the holidays. At first, the tape is nothing more than a random series of unrelated images. However the images end abruptly, and what follows is an inexplicable message that condemns the viewer to die in seven days unless they complete a charm. But to Asakawa’s horror, the instructions have been erased. Now it becomes a race against the clock to find out the mystery of the tape, the truth behind the curse and who made it.
Soon Asakawa realises the images themselves are a series of clues, which point to a terrible secret and an insatiable revenge against humanity.”
____________________
‘SPIRAL’ – BOOK 2
“Dr. Ando suffers from nightmares. In his dreams he is trying to save his drowning son. But everyday he wakes to the cruel reality of his death and the fact that his marriage has all but fallen apart. The only thing keeping him going is his job – performing autopsies. That is, until his old rival Ryuji Takayama, turns up on the steel slab. In High School, Ryuji was famous for being a codebreaker. He would have remained undefeated, if it wasn’t for Ando. Yet here he is, and ironically Ando has the honour of doing the last duties. But Ryuji’s death soon turns out to be as cryptic as the codes they used to crack back in school. A blood test reveals the impossible truth that Ryuji died from a virus supposed to be extinct, and it turns out he isn’t the only one to have been infected. Being the only person ever to have beat Ryuji, Ando gets the unshakable feeling that his friend is controlling things from beyond the grave by chosing him to solve this mystery.
It’s not long before Ando’s investigation leads him to a videotape, and a crucial choice between life, death – and rebirth.”
____________________
‘LOOP’ – BOOK 3
“In the ‘Ring’, vendetta came in the form of a videotape. In ‘Spiral’, a mutating virus threatened the entire diversity of life. In ‘Loop’, everything about the ‘Ring’ universe is turned on its head, as the story opens on Kaoru Futami, a precocious ten year old boy born to an era on the brink of a cancer epidemic. This new, aggressive form of the illness is incurable; yet Kaoru has hope as his father lies dying in a hospital along with many other patients. Now a medical student, Kaoru sets out to discover the origins of the disease which takes him to the barren desert of New Mexico and the abandoned HQ’s of the elusive ‘Loop’ project. What he discovers there is an advanced artificial life programme designed to imitate all stages of human civilization. As Kaoru watches events unfold, he realises that a virus mysteriously wiped out the inhabitants of the virtual world; a virus that managed to escape the ‘Loop’ project and somehow find its way into reality.
Yet that isn’t all. Kaoru also finds himself facing a shocking personal truth and a destiny requiring the ultimate sacrifice.”
The reason I chose these books is because despite of their place in popular culture and the ‘hype’ generated by their film versions, I strongly believe they deserve to be recognised as literary fiction.
“The Ring Trilogy? Wait a minute… isn’t that mainstream fiction, Science-Fiction, Gothic horror? How the ‘Ring’ compare to the likes of ‘The English Patient’ and ‘The Catcher in the Rye’?”
Well, it can’t. Purely because of the difference in genres, but more importantly because books like the trilogy only begin to work on a literary level when it is perceived as a synergistic whole. In other words, you have to read them in order to get the full effect of the intricate way in which the seemingly disconnected plots come together to form the ‘big picture’. Suzuki also provides access to Japanese folklore, offering insight into how various supernatural beliefs developed in this culture. There is also the way each book takes mythological themes of death, life and rebirth and re-works them into a perspective the modern reader can easily relate to. One common problem is that literary fiction is often confused with the ‘Classics’. While the canon will always remain as a set number of key texts, literary fiction is the quite the opposite. If it can be regarded as a genre, it is the most flexible of them all, as literary fiction can turn up in any style of writing. To clear things up, I feel a great need to classify once and for all exactly what literary fiction means.
Literary Fiction – A Short Introduction
The term itself is very difficult to pin down and is surrounded by a plethora of preconceived ideas, most of which are often negative to say the least. The words ‘literary fiction’ are often associated with highbrow art that is often written in a way to be largely unintelligible to the average reader, and more often than not, with a focus on garnering as many awards as it possibly can.
While some of these are tell-tale traits of literary fiction, I am glad to say that it isn’t as straight-forward or narrow as that. ‘Literary’ means ‘of words’, and a work of literary fiction often indicates one to be of considerable merit within its own respectful genre. It may also mean that the book is written with a focus on style, psychological depth or character development.The best thing about literary fiction, is that it often has something important to say about its subject matter or about the art of writing, which means a relatively new book can be classed as literary fiction.
These are traits carried by the books as each one takes the ‘viral’ theme and develops it in a new direction. While some people may not like the progressive changes Suzuki made in his follow-up novels, I thoroughly enjoyed them, as it challenged me to refocus my own theories and assumptions about the plot which taught me a lot about how important it is to keep a story as creative as possible. It was also wonderful to see a work that straddles more than one genre keep the plot balanced between the two. Even though horror and science-fiction do go quite well together, it is difficult to produce a story that is ‘credible’ enough to keep the reader involved, and this is a very important factor for both these genres. If you think of literary classics like Orwell’s ‘1984’ and Shelley’s ‘Frankenstein’, both depicted at the time, a fantastical future that was thoroughly make-believe. But what made them so popular for later generations was their grounding in the political and scientific theories at the time. Of course today’s critics hail them as works of immense foresight, as some of those fantastical things have become a reality.
Frankenstein’s monster was created by various body parts and resurrected through ‘galvanism’ or lightning. Today, doctors can perform amazing surgical feats such as skin grafts and organ transplants. We have also discovered that the human body has its own electrical current and cloning is now a reality. ‘Big Brother’ was the theme of Orwell’s dystopian story, as people are ruled by a despotic government that perpetrates mind control, constant surveillance of its citizens and torture. This scenario is not far off, as some governments i.e. China and Iran constantly monitor, block and censor information on the internet that goes against it’s policies. In a time where freedom of speech and thought has never been so relaxed; there are still parts of the world where people are punished for their thoughts.
In the ‘Ring’, the now extinct smallpox virus finds it’s way onto a video tape, which when viewed infects its audience in the form of a curse. In ‘Spiral’ this virus mutates, finding it’s way onto the internet and to millions of viewers. The result is an epidemic on an unprecedented scale. Contrary to popular belief, in reality the smallpox virus is all but extinct. It is still kept alive in two places; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in United States and the State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology VECTOR in Koltsovo, Russia. There have been rumours that the virus is intended for use in biological warfare.
The viral theme however does not end here, as in ‘Loop’ we are introduced to the concept of artificial intelligence; something that many programmers are working on. Lately gaming systems like the Nintendo Wii have made physical interaction a part of the gaming experience. There is a great desire to create an ‘intuitive’ relationship between man and machine. The iPad is a great example of how this what with the development of the ergonomic touchscreen and the facility to flip the screen any way you like. I feel that it’s only a matter of time before a totally independent artificial intelligence program is created. What something like this will bring only time will tell, but one thing is for sure, art often does imitate life which gives me the feeling that fiction offers us an uncanny glimpse into the future.
These are but a few of the big themes these books analyse. As technology takes over making our lives more easier, we tend to lose other things. We become alienated from the organic and the natural. What Suzuki tries to illustrate is what happens when the unnatural begins to control our lives as it changes it against our will. The symbol of the virus comes to mean many things. The mutation of it throughout the three books shows the relentless process of evolution and the fact that we haven’t arrived at out final state and we are still a work in progress. The creation of artificial intelligence (playing ‘god’) brings about the ‘curse’ or the cross all humanity has to bear for making something it cannot even begin to fathom. I could go on and on, but I would be giving away a lot of spoilers, and that wouldn’t be fair for those who wish to read and find out for themselves.
Oh, and for all those who think that Suzuki might have stolen the ‘world within a world’ plot from the Matrix films, think again. ‘Loop’ was first published a year before Matrix Reloaded was screened. How’s that for predictive fiction?
Pingback: Tweets that mention Welcome to the Literary Blog Hop! « Zee's Wordly Obsessions -- Topsy.com
Thanks for participating in the blog hop with us! Very interesting post — I never realized that the movie was based on a book, or a series of books, for that matter. Thanks for enlightening me.
Thanks for the invite Connie. It’s great that you thought of a literary blog hop. Everything is so YA these days.
I hope you read them some time. They really are worth it. It’s amazing how many movies are actually books to start off with. ‘Solaris’, ‘Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas’. All of these are literary books, both very different from each other, yet have a lot to say about their respective topics.
We are very much in sync on what literary fiction is, Zee. I honestly had the conventional (from the movies) opinion of The Ring and it is a pleasant surprise to find out that the books have more to say.
I imagine we (readers) miss out on so many books based on that literary or not designation. If we really get a handle on what literary fiction is we’d find a literary world much richer and clearer than we see now.
Great analysis and review!
Hi Mayowa. Thanks for dropping by.
Glad to see you think so too. Yes, not a lot of people know about them unfortunately. I only found out when I read the first book and discovered there were others. I have since become a firm fan of Suzuki. He writes on such a diverse range of topics. In his native Japan he is more famous for his series of books on fatherhood and child-rearing would you believe it!
Like Mayowa, I saw the movie, “The Ring.” It was one of my favorite horror movies ever, and I only like a few anymore – I’m not into the torture and mutilation franchises, thank you very much. Thanks for giving some background on this series, which sounds even more fascinating than the movie based on “The Ring” – which, as is usual and necessary with movies, left a lot of the book’s ground uncovered. All three of these books sound fascinating. Oh my, is there any more room on my to-read list?
The movie was very effective. The torture thing isn’t my cup of tea either. I think it’ll interest you to know that Suzuki is an avid traveller himself. His dream was to cross America from West to East coast on a motorcycle. He achieved this dream of his and it became a part of the the third book in the ring cycle. The main character Kaoru travels to the desert on his motorcycle and the descriptions of the scenery there have haunted me ever since.
I don’t think I’ve ever fell in love with a desert landscape before reading Spiral.
I fell in love with the desert when I lived in New Mexico. There’s strange beauty in tall red mesas, painted hills, and wide open sky. I suppose loving the desert depends on which part of it you’re in, what part of your surroundings you focus on, and whether you have plenty of water on hand.
True! Being stranded in the desert doesn’t sound like fun. But I suppose there’s a starkness about it that cleanses your soul. It’s so hard to find a place that is free from the touch of man, where you can just feel nature right up close to you. In cities and surburban areas, nature can hardly be called nature. It’s confined to parks and manicured lawns. The real outdoors should make a person feel humble.
I love your impassioned defense of the Ring trilogy. I am so convinced that my Amazon one-click hand is twitching….I like the comparison to Frankenstein (one of my favorite novels)….as you so convincingly show, often a literary work will tap into a deeper truth (even a scientific one) and also a cultural hot spot. You also make a valid point about the distinction between literary and classic….
Hi Lisa, thanks for stopping by. I’m glad you enjoyed the article. It took me forever to write it! There were just so many comparisons I could have written about. My head was reeling. In the end I decided it’s not fair to spoil it for other readers, as nothing beats picking up a book and being surprised by the events that unfold. That’s such a rare and precious feeling and I’m pretty sure you’ll experience it with Suzuki.
Since writing this blog I think I’m going to have to go on a series of ‘What is’ articles, starting with literary fiction followed by a definition of Classics and the canon.
Glad I found your blog. Great essay! The trilogy is probably still too scary for me to enjoy, but I am happy to know more about it.
Rose City Reader.
Hi, I really enjoyed visiting your blog too and finding out about the 12 volume mammoth read you posted about! With regards to scariness – the first book is probably the most scariest as it contains more gothic elements to it. With Suzuki there’s more of a ‘shock’ element to his writing. You just dont expect him to come up with the things he does. I love a writer that dodges my guesses!
Thanks so much Zee for this great post! I’m glad that you took this opportunity to argue for books that not many people have heard about, beyond the movie.
“‘Literary’ means ‘of words’, and a work of literary fiction often indicates one to be of considerable merit within its own respectful genre.” That is so well said.
Thanks for commenting Ingrid! I suppose I wanted readers to realise that literary fiction isn’t all ‘stiff upper lip’. It can be modern and to the times and still have a depth to it that makes the reader think.
The thing that really bugs me are these ghost-written stories that are churned out and fed to people as proper fiction. Real writing is, unfortunately, losing popularity as the Katie Price’s of this world occupy important shelf-space in our bookshops. I shudder to think what the average teenagers reading material is nowadays.
I had no idea these were books (the film scared the bejesus outta me)
I will most certainly check thse out, thankyou!
You’re welcome. I’m glad you found them interesting. They are very much worth a look. Oh, and I love your selections too. Lord of the Rings rule big time, as does Henry James.
Sounds like literary fiction to me. And trust me. I’m an expert.
*grins* Gereat to have you second my opinion, debnance.
Fascinating post! I really liked your thoughts about Frankenstein, which I’ve recently read. It’s true: literary fiction can certainly delve into science/fantasy fiction.
Thanks for sharing! 🙂
You’re welcome. Frankenstein is such a wonderful book. I wish more people would pay attention to it.
I like how you talked about the difference between classics and literature, especially when you mentioned the difference between how Frankenstein and Nineteen-Eighty-Four was perceived when they were first published and now. Also, I never would have thought about parallels between modern medicine and Frankenstein. Actually – I’ve never even read it. Horrible, right?
Anyway, great post, & I think choosing the trilogy was a stroke of genius to illustrate your points about literature.
Thanks friande! Yeah, Frankenstein is such a flexible book in terms of resources – it lends itself very well to comparisons. My thesis was partially based on the concept of modern medicine and its foreshadowing in science fiction. There is a lot to be learned from the old classics, it would be an excellent addition to your 100 books challenge.
great post. like some of the other commenters, i had no idea that the film was originally a book. the way you write about the trilogy (especially the different directions the viral theme takes in each of the books) is very appealing…if I can get copies, these are going to land pretty high on my reading list.
as a side note of sorts, i got here – predictably enough – through the hop. i’ve read a few of your other posts and am looking forward to reading what else you’ve got up here.
I hope you enjoy them Ellen, and thanks for dropping by. It always feels good to know that you’ve steered someone towards good books that they wouldn’t otherwise have known about.
I look forward to your comments.
Very intriguing. Admittedly, I’ve avoided the films like the plague since horror works on my nerves something fierce. The distinction you make between the genre of “literary fiction” and the cannon is important and one that, as you stated and I certainly concur with, is too often over misunderstood. Toni Morrison, for example, is literary and yet she has elements of magic or the paranormal within her works; still, her works are not considered “classic” literature to the best of my knowledge.
Thank you for taking the time to discuss this series of books. It’s wonderful to learn more about them than, I think, the films would have allowed.